Foreign airlines may get to buy stakes in domestic carriers
NEW DELHI: To ease the growing pressure on airport infrastructure due to the ongoing aviation boom, the government is considering a package of suggestions from the Investment Commission including modernisation of 10 non-metro airports with private sector participation. The panel has also suggested that foreign airlines be allowed to acquire stake in domestic carriers and the conclusion of open skies pacts with key countries like the UK and Singapore.
Reduction of the price of aviation turbine fuel (ATF) to international levels and modernisation of the Kolkata and Chennai airports on the same lines as Delhi and Mumbai are also among the other key suggestions under consideration, government sources said. The package is aimed to attract investments of around $17 billion by ’10.
Headed by Ratan Tata, the Commission has recommended that special purpose vehicles (SPVs) be formed to expand and modernise non-metro airports. The government should also provide viability-gap funding.
Upgradation of air traffic control (ATC) systems and training for ATC personnel is also important to ensure that airport infrastructure is developed adequately to meet air traffic growth needs, the panel has said. The ATC system, for example, should be comparable with the infrastructure available at Hong Kong, Singapore and Dubai. Growth in passenger and cargo traffic could be sustained only if infrastructure is upgraded and expanded, the Commission thinks. Present investments in airport infrastructure is only 20% of the requisite levels.
Is there any merit in MCA's saying that domestic carriers be allowed to develop a certain critical mass before they are exposed to foreign players, or are they condraticting themselves considering they are reluctant to allow private carriers to fly out?
Moreover, as it is being considered that 5-yr period be reduced to 3-yrs, is it the right time to take both the steps, or should we wait and see if private carriers can fly out without FDI?
Do you think infustion of FDI in private carriers is essential for industry as a whole, or just cleaning up the system thereby encouraging established industrial houses be enough to promote the industry?
It is a debatable issue, foreign airlines stake. USA doesn't allow foreign airlines more than 49% (correct?), there is a rider on management-voting rights too wherein not more than 20% of the board nominees with voting rights can be non-US citizens. It makes sense when u study the takeover of Airlanka management by EK, they paid $40m for a 10yr stake and the first management decision foll takeover was to buy 9 A330s, a $5m discount on each of those A330 would have netted the EK group $45m, profit in first year of management.
Here in this region of the world most airlines are dependent on India for atleast 25% of their pax to form a critical mass to sustain ops. They have more than a simple investment interest in getting a stake into an indian airline. The likes of SQ and EK are heavily dpendent on the Indian market for traffic, Indian carriers are a threat, not only in the case of Indian pax but also tran-asia/australia pax. The kangroo route is presently seeing a bloody fight between Gulf, European and Asian carriers, throw the lean, mean and low-cost Indian airlines (cash strapped though) alongwith a dozen indian airports supporting their ops and you have a virtual massacare starting there. Thai, Malay, Dubai, Sin all are heavily dependent on 1 single airline with 1 single hub supporting their tourist economy. With half-dozen indian airlines, alongwith swanky new half-dozen metro airports with potential to expand ops are likely to cause grief to these small state players and their airlines.
Alliance, merger or acquisition of domestic airlines by these regional behemoths aren't going to help with bringing any best practises home. Firstly, most of them operate in a totalitarian administration so their exp of smooth ops has not been exposed to the brutal inspection of various agencies operating in a truly democratic system ( better or worse) as in India. Secondly unlike other industries involving manf, power generation etc where there is a large dependence on R&D the issue of tech transfer doesn't arise here. Anyway, Indians have proven their worth in EK & SQ as well as heading many majors like UA & US Airways, not to mention Kale asso from India, the leading players in revenue management.
Yes the airlines in India desperately need capital, the question is how do they get access to it without being manipulated by airlines with vested interests in Indian aviation growth.