The Central subsidy is being used to make up for the carrier’s losses, former aviation minister owns up
Sanjay Dubey New Delhi
The Supreme Court’s recent stay on the Allahabad High Court’s order banning haj subsidy has ended the uncertainty surrounding this year’s haj pilgrimage, but it has not put to rest debate over why there is such a subsidy in the first place. The key question being asked is: Do hajis even benefit from the subsidy or are they in fact being overcharged?
BJP vice-president Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi, chairman of the haj air charter committee which is responsible for negotiating and fixing the fare, says, “The subsidy is not for pilgrims. It is for Air-India to compensate for its losses. During normal times, travellers are charged around Rs 20,000 for Jeddah with less than 50 percent flight occupancy. But during haj, charter fare is arbitrarily fixed to, in some cases, more than Rs 50,000.” Hajis pay Rs 12,000 for their ticket while the Centre bears the rest. Naqvi says that his repeated requests to the ministry of civil aviation (MCA) for a meeting of the air charter committee went unheeded. According to Tanveer Ahmed, the outgoing chairman of the Central Haj Committee (CHC), “When an aircraft is chartered, then the charges of only 50 percent of its capacity are levied as per the International Air Transport Association (IATA) guidelines.” After making allowance for two vacant runs from Jeddah to Delhi during inward travel and Delhi to Jeddah while going to pick the hajis, and given the fact that the charter flights run to 100 percent capacity, the fare for the pilgrims should be less than the Rs 29,400 IATA fare.
“The charter fare should only be about 75 percent of the IATA fare as was the case earlier. But now, it is nearly 125 percent of that,” says Syed Shahabuddin, former joint secretary in-charge of haj affairs and vice president of the CHC. He feels that the increase in charter fare is meant to fool the minority community and reroute the subsidy provided to hajis by the government back to government coffers. The hajis are ferried to Jeddah and back by both Air-India and Saudi Airlines, so, in effect the Saudi national carrier is also reaping the benefits of the government’s haj subsidy.
This unrealistic charter fare raises a few questions: Why do Air-India and Saudi Airlines have a monopoly on transporting pilgrims? Why has a global tender not been invited and who decides charter fare?
Former Civil Aviation Minister Syed Shahnawaz Hussain claims credit for Air-India’s stranglehold on the haj subsidy. “During my tenure, I made sure that government subsidy goes only to another department. After 9/11, every airline was in deep losses, while Air-India was in black, thanks to haj subsidy.” Since then, global tenders have not been invited. The charter fare, Hussain asserts, was based on the previous global bidding. He says besides Air-India, no good carrier submitted bids. Ahmed disagrees. “In 2000, we floated a global tender and employed a good airlines at a lower fare,” he says.
Air-India charges much less for its London flight than for the haj flight, which is half the distance, despite being full. In fact, such was the secrecy surrounding the fixing of charter fare till 2004 that it was not even known to Ahmed.
He says, “They (the ministry) never told us about the charter fare and we got to know about it only in 2004 In some cases, it was around Rs 50,000.”
The deeper you dig, the bigger the mess you uncover!
The Govt. really needs to get it's hands out of running airlines, and merge/privatize both AI and IC. They'll be doing themselves and all Indians a huge favour!
The deeper you dig, the bigger the mess you uncover!
The Govt. really needs to get it's hands out of running airlines, and merge/privatize both AI and IC. They'll be doing themselves and all Indians a huge favour!
What surprises me is that none of these thelka.coms have managed to do a scoop on these 2 rotting white elephants. Inspite of the media in India being hyperactive i haven't seen any investigative reports or close anaylsis of the state of Indian aviation. The potential for this indutry to generate jobs for the youth of this country is phenomenal, apart from boosting the economy. BOM and DEL airport can provide direct employment to nearly 100,000 people each by the end of this decade. With the advent of media every small town sushila dreams of being a hostie and every suresh wants to be a pilot. These dreams are possible and should be fulfilled but for these 2 barriers to growth.
I think the sticky thread on imp telephone contacts could have another sticky thread on contact details of MPs on the consltative commitee for MoCA and also active young MPs. Bombard them with your letters from around the world, demand to know why is the welfare of 35000 pampered indians more important than that of another 2million that can directly benefit from this boom. Write to them of any wrong doing you know of with a copy to the press and one stuck here.
I know many of you here will Q my activisim while seated comfortably here in the west. Believe me i've been trying to do my own bit though unsuccessfully. But then there you go if you think there is something that i could do to chip in my bit let me know.
Air India year profit slides 82 percent: company source
NEW DELHI, Sept 26, 2006 (UNI)
International flag-carrier Air India’s net profit slid in 2006 by 82 percent, hit by high fuel costs and competition from private rivals, a source at the state-owned airline said Tuesday.
The net profit for the year to March totalled 162.9 million rupees (3.54 million dollars) on revenues that rose 25 percent to 96.77 billion rupees, an airline spokesman who did not wish to be named said.
Tougher times loomed, the airline spokesman said, predicting that revenue growth would slow to 15 percent in the current financial year.
Air India’s fuel bill jumped by almost 44 percent to hit 31.34 billion rupees in 2005-06, up from 21.82 billion in the previous year.
‘‘Overall fundamentals were sound but expenses rose sharply led by factors like higher aviation fuel costs,’’ the airline official said.
Earlier this month, Air India announced it had raised its jet fuel hedging limit to 75,000 barrels per day from 30,000 in a bid to offset volatile fuel prices.
The airline this year became the first Indian carrier to hedge its fuel costs through the use of financial derivative tools such as swaps.
The numbers of passengers rose nine percent to 4.8 million, the official said.
Air India has been under pressure from mounting competition from other international carriers which boast newer fleets and Indian private rivals that have begun flights to London and Southeast Asia.
In January, Air India signed an agreement to buy 68 Boeing jets for around 11 billion dollars to upgrade its ageing fleet, marking the biggest deal in Indian aviation history.
After DECADES of being in the same building (Dorabjees in Camp, the parsi connection u see!!) AI has shifted out to a new office in an obscure corner of Mangaldas Road (ie Wadia College). No intimation of change nothing. It was the female at the IC office who guided me there.
I was shocked at the interior of this "new" office. i wish i had a camera with me!! And inside were 6 tables with AI express colors (replica of the one at the airport). On each table was a board that read "TRAINEE" in bold letters and a total of 6 tamilian girls (no kidding!!), probably recruited from the same batch handling the bookings!! They took over 30 mins to book a single ticket for me and the 2 other passengers were standing around exasperated!!
The 3 senior ladies (one of whom used to handle the counter in the old office) and the manager of the office just stood around chatting!! Bang at 1pm, the watchman slams the main door shut, and barring the 3 girls handling the customers, the rest of the staff start having their meals and making idle talk AT the desks in full view of the passengers!!
I also visited the 9W and IC offices yesterday to book the other tickets in my iten. The IC office also had a sarkaari look all over but it certainly wasnt as bad as the AI office. And the IC staff went to an inner room for the lunch. My request (an 8-coupon Executive class booklet) was handled even though it was lunch time.
The 9W office was the most professional! They didnt close for lunch and there were atleast 2 staff handling the counters even during lunch hour.
Bang at 1pm, the watchman slams the main door shut, and barring the 3 girls handling the customers, the rest of the staff start having their meals and making idle talk AT the desks in full view of the passengers!!
The same in any State Government or Government of India undertaking/office.
MUMBAI: Nothing can stop the pilferage of liquor bottles from Air India's in-flight bar, it seems.
Months after reports of stolen liquor bottles onboard the Prime Minister's Air India flight generated a rash of bad publicity for the airline, theft seems to be back: another cabin crew member was caught red-handed recently.
According to sources, Jaya P (name changed), an AI cabin crew member and committee member of the AI Cabin Crew Association, was caught red-handed by the airline security, when she disembarked from a London-Delhi flight where she was on duty.
"She had cleared customs and was on her way out, when she was intercepted by the AI security. Bottles of Red Label were found in her bag that were stolen from the in-flight consumption bar," said the source.
AI spokesperson confirmed the incident, saying that investigation is on into the matter. Pilferage of beverages or other items meant for airline passengers amounts to violation of cabin crew service ethics and is dealt with seriously by airlines around the world.
The rules are strict and most international airlines dismiss those who do not follow the code of conduct.
Air India has been cracking down on such thefts, since the time it earned notoriety for thefts that took place on the airline's high-security flights operated for the Prime Minister.
They have a method of catching a crew stealing in-flight stuff like drinks etc.
They track every crew's baggages with security's help regularly and just don't catch a crew but they take notice as to how often he or she takes away in-flight stuff.
When it comes to an extent thats when they catch him or her.
So AI after all gives a chance...steal till your caught
__________________
Light travels faster than sound...thats why people appear bright, until you hear them talk!
Published: October 9, 2006 PARIS As the international airline authorities strive to harmonize the rules for carry-on luggage, a Russian- American jazz musician is nursing a broken arm sustained in a struggle with the French airport police that erupted over his demand that he be permitted to board a flight with his prized trumpet.
Valery Ponomarev, 63, once a member of Art Blakey's "Jazz Messengers," was preparing to board an Air India flight Sept. 9 from Paris to New York City when a routine airport ritual erupted into a fierce dispute over his 1961 Connstellation trumpet.
"If you've ever played a musical instrument, then you should know how strong the bond is between the musician and the instrument," Ponomarev said in an interview, explaining his unlikely emergence as a jazz warrior. "You wouldn't give your baby away to anybody and so you wouldn't give away your horn."
In his case, the ties were so powerful that he simply would not let go of his trumpet case, which also contained a fluegelhorn.
But the authorities were not sympathetic and maintained that the trumpeter had hit all the wrong notes in a time of heightened security.
Ponomarev said that when he arrived late to board his evening flight, a flustered Air India employee retrieved his trumpet from a luggage belt at a security checkpoint without explanation to place it in the plane's hold.
Ponomarev protested vigorously, he said, because he had carried the instrument onto an earlier connecting flight and also had noticed that another passenger was carrying aboard a sitar. His angry complaints attracted the notice of an Air India supervisor, who summoned the police.
Four officers came running to take his trumpet case, but Ponomarev refused to give it to them, prompting one of them to subdue him by wrenching his arm behind his back, breaking it.
The airport authorities and the police confirmed that the incident took place as Ponomarev was trying to board the flight at Charles de Gaulle airport.
But in the view of the police, the musician bears responsibility for his injury. "The officers tried to subdue him and you can say that he hurt himself by rebelling," a spokesman for the airport police said.
H. Rana, the regional manager for Air India's Paris office, said airline employees called the police because Ponomarev insisted on carrying his music case on board. She said that Air India required the check-in of large instruments, although it would permit smaller ones.
In Europe, carry-on rules vary among airlines. Last week, the European Commission moved to harmonize the rules, with new regulations taking effect in the spring that restrict liquids carried aboard to personal use and that limit luggage size. But there will be an exemption for cameras and musical instruments, which are permitted in airplane cabins.
The changes come too late for Ponomarev, who said that after his arm was broken he was held in detention without treatment for six hours and was not allowed to make any telephone calls.
Ultimately, he was taken to a hospital, where a doctor loaned him a cellphone to call the U.S. Embassy.
After surgery, Ponomarev returned Sept. 13 to the United States on another Air India flight. With metal pins holding the bones of his left arm together, Ponomarev said the break had an immediate effect on his career: He was forced to cancel a musical engagement and limit his daily practice because it was too painful to hold the trumpet with his weakened arm.
By late September, though, he decided to participate in one long-scheduled jazz concert in Russia, where he was born, although he has lived in the United States since 1973. The announcer, he said, explained to the audience that Ponomarev was playing despite a struggle with the French police.
"I think the audience thought that he was joking," Ponomarev said. But he still took the microphone to correct the announcer. "They didn't win the battle," he said. "They broke my arm. But the horn is still with me."
Air India flight grounded at Heathrow, 338 passengers stranded
London, Oct. 14 (PTI): More than 300 passengers of a Mumbai-bound Air India flight have been stranded here for three days after the Boeing 747-400 was grounded at Heathrow airport following a bird hit.
The New York-London-New Delhi-Mumbai flight with 434 passengers returned to Heathrow within 20 minutes of taking off on Thursday night following what officials said was a "technical fault" that forced the pilot to dump fuel before landing.
An Air India spokesperson in Mumbai told PTI today that 96 passengers were flown by a relief aircraft to New Delhi via Ahmedabad. "The remaining 338 passengers have been accommodated at various hotels near Heathrow airport," the spokesperson said.
The aircraft was scheduled to depart late in the evening and reach New Delhi by noon tomorrow.
K D Row, Air India's Regional Manager for UK and Ireland, said, "The flight returned to the airport as one of the engines was not able to work. We had to replace it. The engine was flown in from India yesterday with the engineers and the faulty engine was replaced today."
Row said the stranded passengers were paid an interim daily allowance of 50 pounds each. "The are being looked after," he said.
Asked if the Boeing was grounded due to a bird hit, Row said the engineers "presumed it was so but it would be known once the faulty engine was opened up".
Air India sources in Mumbai said the aircraft was grounded due to heavy ingestion in one of its engines after it was hit by a bird.
Stranded plane returns to India, passengers furious
New Delhi, Oct. 15 (PTI): An Air India flight grounded at London's Heathrow airport for the past two days arrived here this afternoon with over 300 passengers, who appeared angry at the airline's handling of the situation.
A large number of relatives were present to receive the passengers of the New York-London-New Delhi-Mumbai flight that touched down at the Indira Gandhi International Airport here at around 1200 hours.
The passengers, who said they had undergone an unexpected ordeal in the past two days in London, vent their ire at Air India officials who "did not do anything" to help them.
A majority of them said they had spent a night inside the airport and then about two days in a "sub-standard" hotel. The passengers did not hide their displeasure at Air India "not taking proper care" of them.
The Boeing 747-400 with 434 passengers returned to Heathrow within 20 minutes of taking off on Thursday night following the bird-hit. Ninety-six passengers were yesterday flown by a relief aircraft to New Delhi via Ahmedabad while the others returned today after the Boeing's damaged engine was replaced.
"I left New York on October 11. It took five days to reach Delhi. What can be more disgusting than this?" said Harbans Kaur, who pointed out she had obtained leave for only 15 days to attend a family function here.
"The treatment we got in London is really a lifetime experience. Nobody took proper care of the passengers. We had to spend the night of October 12 in the lawns of the airport as no accommodation was provided to us," the 50-year-old Kaur told PTI.
Kaur's husband Harjit Ghai said the passengers were confused after the flight returned to Heathrow as there was no communication from Air India about the reason for delay in taking off again for India.
"We did not know what was the cause of delay. There was complete chaos and confusion. After five or six hours of the scheduled departure time, we were told that the flight would not go due to a technical snag," he said.
Kanta Supti, a nurse in London, said the airline's officials were not to be seen during the "entire terrible night. Only the next morning, we were taken to a hotel.
"Some Air India people came and took us to a hotel, which was a sub-standard one. The food was so bad that I could not eat it," she said.
"I will make a claim for compensation. This is not the service I had expected," Supti said.
Despite all their anger, the passengers emotionally hugged their relatives who came to receive them at the arrival terminal here.
"I have come as I am getting married on October 28. Now two days have been wasted," said Sandeep Gill.
The passengers were unhappy as nobody from Air India had apologised for the problems they had faced.
"Even after so much ill-treatment, nobody from Air India came and apologised. I will definitely make a complaint to the authorities," said Ajeet Singh, whose wife and son came by the flight.
****
This report deserves 5 stars for humour!!!!
Passengers miffed at AI service
Flight AI 112 delayed in London, 248 stranded complain of officials’ ‘lackadaisical attitude’
Express News Service
Mumbai, october 15: The 20-odd passengers of the Air India (AI) flight from London that landed in Mumbai on Sunday are not a happy lot. They are of the opinion that the national carrier officials did not treat them well during their three-day stay in the English capital.
These passengers, along with 248 others, were stranded in London as the flight (AI 112) took them back to the place after taking off sighting a technical snag.
According to the grudging passengers, the drama began even before the flight took off. The New York-London-New Delhi-Mumbai (AI 112) flight was to depart from London at 9.45 pm on October 12, but was delayed for four hours. ‘‘It finally departed at about 2 am,’’ said Tapan Karambelkar, a business management student who was returning home.
Karambelkar added that after about 20 minutes of flying when the seat belt sign had just come off, the pilot announced that the plane had developed a ‘‘technical fault’’ and they would have to return to Heathrow airport. The aircraft made an emergency landing after dumping fuel into the English Chanel.
‘‘While on flight, we were told that AI officials would help us as soon as we landed,’’ recalled Karambelkar. But for the next two hours, the harrowed passengers saw no AI official at the airport. ‘‘There was a lot of confusion. No one turned up for a long time,’’ said Jayantilal Vaishnav, a medicine manufacturer. ‘‘Every time we called the communication centre, we were given different information,’’ an angry Dr Salil Dhamankar, a paediatrician, said.
The passengers were later put up in three hotels for the next two days — their food taken care of, but there was still no clue of when they would finally depart.
‘‘They really didn’t have any contingency plan. Any other airline would have had something in place to help people who wanted to go on an emergency,’’ said Dr Dhamankar. ‘‘Our luggage was on the plane, but we were herded to the hotels. We lost a lot of time.’’
The plane finally took off on Saturday after Air India sent the spare parts from India to get the aircraft repaired. But then, it was not without hiccups as the lights kept going off while the plane taxied around on the tarmac— due to a ’technical problem’.
The spokesperson for Air India, S Venkat, when contacted said that the emergency landing had to be made as there had been a ‘‘foreign object injection’’ either from the runway or in air. Explaining the delay in deciding what had to be done with the passengers, he said, ‘‘We had to try and see if the problem could be solved. Once that was ruled out, the passengers were provided accommodation in hotels. Ours was not the only flight that was cancelled that day, two other flights were also cancelled. That led to a lot of confusion at the airport initially. But we did look after the passengers well.’’
Gives no details. Does the reporter mean emergency landing or mid-air turbulence? As all of us know the standard of knowledge of avaition in most Indian newspapers, this may be just one of those cases!!
CNN-IBN Posted Monday , October 16, 2006 at 09:41 Updated Monday , October 16, 2006 at 09:46 Email Print
ROUTIENE RITUAL: This is the second such instance involving an Air India plane in the last week.
New Delhi: A Mumbai-bound Air India flight from Jeddah made a crash-landing in Muscat after developing mid-air turbulence.
Eight passengers aboard the AI-865 Mumbai-Hyderabad-Jeddah plane reportedly suffered injuries, but seven of them were discharged after being administered first aid.
However, one of the passengers is still admitted in Kandra Hospital in Jeddah.
The flight had taken off from the Jeddah Airport at 0000 hrs (IST) for Hyderabad, Air India officials said.
This is the second such instance involving an Air India plane in the last week.
On last Thursday Air India’s plane, Boeing 747-400, with 434 passengers on board was grounded after 20 minutes of its taking off from the Heathrow Airport, after it reported a bird hit.
The plane New York- London-New Delhi-Mumbai bound flight took the passengers two days to reach India.
***
Here are the revised details:
14 Jeddah-bound AI passengers injured as flight hit turbulence
New Delhi, Oct 16 (UNI)
At least 14 passengers of Air India’s Jeddah-bound flight from Mumbai via Hyderabad suffered injuries when the Airbus A310 hit a major air turbulence.
The Air India flight-865 lost height by nearly 5,000 feet after it hit the air turbulence due to bad weather yesterday evening, the airline said in a statement here today.
On landing at Jeddah at 22.40 hrs local time, the injured underwent a thorough check-up by doctors at the airport, it said.
One passenger, suspected to have suffered a minor fracture, is recovering at a local hospital and is expected to be discharged soon, it added.
There were 70 passengers on board, the airline said.
Air-India has yet another angry customer — the civil aviation minister. Praful Patel was scheduled to fly the national carrier from London to Mumbai on Thursday night, when a delayed take-off — reportedly caused by the late arrival of the flight's crew — made him change his plans. He flew back on Jet Airways instead.
On a private visit to London, Patel was to fly back to Mumbai on Air-India. On arrival at Heathrow Airport, the minister discovered that the crew had also only just arrived.
The crew, said sources, was late by well over an hour, resulting in a 30-minute delay in take-off. Patel switched to Jet Airways, which also had a scheduled departure at the same time, 9.30 pm, and landed in Mumbai on schedule.
"I have enough choices," Patel told HT on Saturday. "But what about the average traveller who relies on Air-India and cannot switch flights at a moment's notice?" Patel added that his ministry would be launching an inquiry into this 'negligence'. "We will take action against those who are responsible," he said.
Air-India sources in London said the delay in takeoff was caused by the increased number of security barriers at Heathrow which are manned by the British Airport Authority. The crew had fixed duty hours and could not come in too early, they said.
Patel is not buying the argument. "Other airlines are functioning on time in spite of security checks. If the check takes more time, airline employees will just have to start reporting to work earlier than usual. They cannot keep passengers waiting because they do not want to report to work earlier," he said.
Ironically, the minister had only days ago — during the launch of Indian’s new Airbus aircraft — warned both Air-India and Indian employees. "They have to realise their responsibility towards the country, and the people they fly," he had said. "Every person in the organisation will have to understand that these are changing times." Message received, loud and clear.
Delhi DiaryPublished: Wednesday, 1 November, 2006, 09:57 AM Doha Time
The minister can wait...
By A K B Krishnan
THE president and the prime minister, whenever they go abroad, have their own official aircraft, which is a refurbished and re-configured Boeing 747 from the Air-India fleet. Sonia Gandhi, although not holding any government post, must be reckoned as equally - or even more - powerful since she not only heads the party in power but also has a surname that spells magic to millions of Indians. But she rarely travels abroad, and on the few occasions she had done so, had flown scheduled flights, with a large retinue of course, or had planes chartered by her party.
After these three, the most powerful person in the Indian skies must surely be Civil Aviation Minister Praful Patel. You could say that Patel is, discounting the first three, one in a billion!
And look what happened to Patel last week. On a private visit to London, Patel was scheduled to fly home by an Air-India flight. He had arrived at Heathrow well in time for the flight - a bit unlike back home, one may add - and like everybody else had checked in. But then bad, old Air-India flies by its own standards and its own sweet, slow time, minister or no minister.
The minister checking in does not mean anything to the flight crew. They showed up for the flight at least an hour late. Naturally, Patel was annoyed. And he showed his annoyance by promptly switching flights. He caught a Jet Airways flight, which was scheduled to depart almost at the same time as Air-India, and returned safely to home and hearth.
"I am the minister and I had the facility of switching flights at the last minute. But what about the average passenger who relies on Air-India and cannot change flights at a moment’s notice," fumed Patel on arrival in Mumbai.
You said it, Mr Minister! At least now you know first hand the travails of those who travel by Air-India and, not to forget, Indian Airlines, sorry just ‘Indian’, the new name on old planes flown by the government. (Why they had to change the name - and at great cost too considering the repainting that had to be undertaken on all planes, hoardings, signboards, etc; and the reprinting of all stationery - is something that has engaged the minds of several frequent fliers here. The BJP pack may now want to change it to ‘Bharat’!)
Back to Air-India and Minister Patel’s lament. Just because a minister - not just any minister but the minister for civil aviation - suffered at the hands of Air-India, it made headlines and, according to Patel, an inquiry has been launched. But, quite frankly, haven’t we all somehow grown used to Air-India’s whimsical and quirky behaviour? Thousands of passengers will have harrowing tales to tell about Air-India and Indian. It was only the other day that a New Delhi-bound A-I flight from New York was held up in London for as many as four days!
As for ‘Indian’, the less said the better. "We apologise for this delay (which could be anything between 30 minutes and three hours) which was caused due to the late arrival of the incoming aircraft." That is the near-constant refrain of the stewardess on the PA system in most flights. As if the reason - late arrival of the incoming aircraft - was any consolation for the distraught passenger.
Then again, the question that comes to mind is: how come the aircraft arrived late? There can, of course, be no answer to that.
Gulf passengers are perhaps the worst affected of all.
Not only are they provided with the least desirable aircraft - the spit-polished ones, if there are any in the Air-India fleet, that is, are reserved for the VIP routes, and by that I mean London and New York, and the "Gulfies" end up making do with old, creaking planes - but also get the worst of in-flight services. If the crew couldn’t care less about the civil aviation minister flying from London, why talk of the skilled and semi-skilled worker from the Gulf going home on his long-awaited holiday.
It is another matter that the said worker, too, couldn’t care less about the in-flight service because his mind is set on meeting his family and friends back home and nothing else in the meanwhile matters.
Perhaps Air-India has sensed this and is getting away with all omissions and commissions because the passenger is past caring.
We can safely predict what will come out of the inquiry that Minister Patel has threatened to constitute. There could be some noise initially. Disciplinary action and such would be bandied about.
But once the issue moves in that direction, the unions will take over. They would allege that the government was not providing enough to the crew by way of transport, accommodation, allowances, etc; at stations outside the country or some such explanation for the delayed arrival of the crew. (We are told that security checks at Heathrow and the rush-hour traffic have been cited as reasons). Some dirty linen will be washed in public. There could even be a threat to go on a strike. But finally nothing will come out of it and bad, old Air-India will continue to be just that. Happy flying!
Praful Patel asks national carriers to wake up Thiruvananthapuram, Nov 1 (IANS) Civil Aviation Minister Praful Patel Wednesday asked the management and employees of the national air carriers to wake up and put their act together soon.
Patel accompanied Prime Minister Manmohan Singh at the foundation stone laying for a new international terminal here. A hangar unit of Air India is also being set up near the Thiruvananthapuram airport.
Patel had switched airlines from Air India to Jet Airways last week for flying from London's Heathrow airport to Mumbai as the national carrier's flight was delayed because the crew turned up an hour late.
"If the employees and the management do not wake up in all respects, then things could be bad. They should be effective and what has happened in the last few weeks does not augur well. This should not have happened," said Patel prior to the ceremony.
Patel also thanked the efforts of the prime minister for going ahead with the purchase of 18 new aircraft for the national carriers.
"The last time this happened was when Rajiv Gandhi was prime minister. I am also happy to say that the Thiruvananthapuram airport would now act as the base airport for Air India Express'(Boeing) 737 aircraft," said Patel.
He added that efforts were under way to build a new airport at Kannur in north Kerala.
It appears that the the joke doing the rounds in AI is that Praful Bhaiyya must have been dying to fly by Jet. Just made an excuse of transferring to Jet from AI by saying the crew were late. Anyway the guy is Union Minister for 9W.
karatecatman wrote: It appears that the the joke doing the rounds in AI is that Praful Bhaiyya must have been dying to fly by Jet. Just made an excuse of transferring to Jet from AI by saying the crew were late. Anyway the guy is Union Minister for 9W.
Must have thought that its been long time since I travelled in my own airline... kick off AI as it is I have an excuse as flight is delayed.
So has preferred 9W and they must have openly welcomed him 'back'
__________________
Light travels faster than sound...thats why people appear bright, until you hear them talk!
Long distance flying seems to be becoming more stressful these days as a direct fall out of enhanced threat perception and resultant prolonged hours of complicated security checks at airports across the world, believe a section of aviation experts.
Three hours of buffer reporting time for security reasons before the scheduled departure of the aircraft apart from one hour drive to the airport seems to have turned the joy of flying into nightmare for many international passengers, especially senior citizens who are more susceptible to deep vain thrombosis and heart attacks.
Apart from the additional hours, delayed take offs and landings, the anxiety caused by any possible terrorist attack on board has also added to the already stressed levels causing immediate illness either on board the aircraft or soon after disembarking.
The death of four international passengers within a span of 19 days in November 2006 reported at the Mumbai airport seems to be corroborating the stress theory. Out of the four, while two passengers died on board, the other two died soon after disembarking and all of these deaths are possibly due to cardiac failure.
Air Passengers Association of India (APAI) president Sudhakar Reddy said, "The anxiety levels of passengers have increased and when you fly an American airline, the terrorist threat is much more. The unbelievable security procedures also add to the fear of passengers, which in turn gives rise to more stress. As such long haul flights are stressful and the new phenomenon has added to the problem."
He said the recent deaths of international passengers though is a matter of great concern, it has to be handled with great maturity. "You can not blame an airline, neither you can blame the airport authority for the sudden deaths. All of them have standard procedures to handle such emergencies and asking for a doctor on board each aircraft is too much and impractical. Passengers with medical history should rather consult their doctors before taking a long flight. One should take precautions rather than loosing life," he said.
Airlines said that they could not do any thing for the security checks as this is the need of the hour. Rather they educate the passengers how to effectively handle long haul flights by taking frequent walks inside the flight and drinking more water.
Air India spokesman S Venkat said, "All our cabin crew are trained how to attend to emergencies. We have also tied up a hospital in Bangalore to get instant medical advice to attend to serious cases. We also show a 10 minutes film to all our passengers advising them what to do in long haul flights. It has all details on how to prevent Deep Vain Thrombosis, a frequent phenomenon seen among long stance passengers. Our in-flight managing Namaskar also has details on how to overcome problems during the flight."
Delta Air Lines passenger George Neumann who died was a frequent flyer and he knew how to handle the fatigue in the flight and despite this he died without accessing medical aid. He was travelling business class, which offers more comforts than the economy class and despite this he died. Since he was already at the airport after completing the non-stop flight whose responsibility was he? There was neither a clear answer from the airline nor the airport operators. But Neumann is not alive to fix responsibility. It is high time that the entire aviation industry should devise a strategy to handle such problems rather than indulging in blaming game.
Interesting mix of Boeing jets "will go well with expansion"
CHENNAI: Fresh from concluding an aircraft deal worth Rs.35, 000 crore with U.S. manufacturer Boeing, Air India will try to meet the aspirations of India's globetrotting corporate whiz kids.
"We have managed not only to survive the fierce race in India's civil aviation sector but spread our wings by adding new destinations and are ready to face future challenges with greater confidence with the induction of 68 state-of-the-art Boeing jets," according to V. Thulasidas, Chairman and Managing Director, AI.
The interesting mix of Boeing jets (737s, 777s, 787s), especially the ultra long-range version with the technologically advanced cockpits, will fit in well with the AI's expansion plans.
Be it short or long hauls by these jetliners, passengers will experience a change on the ground as well as on-board. Besides large windows and spacious aisles, the Boeing planes will be equipped with mood lighting systems that will change to match the time, and the air inhaled by passengers will be not dry, Mr. Thulasidas said.
Comfort level
To meet the specific needs of future travellers, Air India invited captains of the industry, including Ratan Tata, the Ambanis and the Birlas and the socialites to give their views on increasing comfort levels in the aircraft seats, complimentary toiletries to be provided for the First and Business Class passengers and improved in-flight entertainment.
"Ratan Tata spent over an hour in the various seats displayed by the national carrier before indicating his choice," Mr. Thulasidas said.
These jetliners would not only be 25 per cent more fuel-efficient, but would carry more passengers without any payload penalty.