In this case, this person filed a writ petition saying that the boeing and airbus aircraft flown by Indian Airlines and Air india have exceeded their "Design Economic Life" and as a result of that, the passengers are being put into danger. The court thought otherwise. Take a look, another short judgement which will give you details.
Case Note: Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Director General of Civil Aviation's circular dated 20.3.1992 - Public Interest Litigation - Writ of mandamus - Use of Airbus and Boeing Aircrafts by Air India and Indian Airlines beyond the period of design economic life - Aircrafts do not become unsafe for flying after Design Economic Life if proper maintenance, repairs and replacement of parts is done in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturers and the aviation authorities.
As long as Mx schedules are carried out on time,An old Aircraft is as good as a New one in terms of Reliability.However with passage of time,due numerous of Checks Increasing & Frequency of those checks more Frequent,to add that component replacements are called for earlier,this all leads to Expenditure which an operator would like to avoid.Hence its easier to work on New craft.
Its a balance & desicion taken by the operator at the time.
Also some Manufacturers use the carrot & stick policy.Where replacement of a particuar component on a craft will be called for frequently leading to expenditure & an offer of Buy back old craft & sell a Discounted new craft will be madfe to the operator which gets tempting
Also some Manufacturers use the carrot & stick policy.Where replacement of a particuar component on a craft will be called for frequently leading to expenditure & an offer of Buy back old craft & sell a Discounted new craft will be madfe to the operator which gets tempting
Sir Mel,
Can you give us some examples.
It will help us corelate and make our search and research solid.